AI: Integrity

The IB was early to make statements about GenerativeAI, and adapt documentation to reflect our new situation. The IB has issued this statement on AI, and here is a short video response from Dr. Matt Glanville (Head of Assessment Principles & Practices), shared as part of FIS's AI Symposium. At WAB, we have updated our Academic Integrity Policy & Guidelines. Please visit the links below for the most recent guidance on Academic Integrity from the IB. 

When we adapt to GenAI use in teaching and learning, consider: 

• What level of GenAI is acceptable for this task?
• How will you make expectations clear to learners? 
• How will drafting, conferencing & feedback support these expectations? 
• What strategies will you use to promote student voice, agency and ownership? 

WAB's culture of great teaching, inquiry, conferencing, feedback and iteration on student learning means we are well-positioned to know our learners and to support Academic Integrity throughout the learning process. Students and Teachers must work together in alignment with our Academic Integrity Policy. 

• Students should know that some (imperfect) detection tools for AI are available, and they need to be honest in their drafting and submission processes. 
• Teachers should not depend on these tools, they are not 100% reliable, and have issues with bias. If you have concerns about Academic Integrity, please work with your programme coordinators and teacher-librarians.